Home / Guides / What can accountants automate

What can accountants actually automate? An honest list from inside a practice

Elio · practising accountant, MC&S · 6 min read · July 2026

Short answer: the chasing, the filing, the re-keying and the status-tracking — the admin wrapped around the work — can be automated today. The judgment, the advice and the client relationship should not be. Here's the specific list, from someone who automated his own firm before offering to automate anyone else's.

Most articles on this topic are written by software vendors working backwards from whatever their product does. I'm a practising accountant at MC&S, an Australian tax and business advisory firm, and everything below runs our practice right now — on real clients, real lodgments and real deadlines. So this is the honest version: what worked, and what we deliberately left alone.

Six things an accounting firm can genuinely automate

1. Drafting client emails (not sending them)

A large share of practice email is predictable: the payment-plan query, the "what do you need from me this year?" question, the request for a copy of last year's return. Software can draft a reply grounded in your firm's actual history with that client — their entities, their jobs, last year's correspondence — and queue it for a human to approve, edit or bin. The accountant keeps the judgment; the software does the typing. The distinction matters enough that we wrote a separate guide on AI email drafting with human approval.

2. Signatures, and everything after the signature

Getting a document signed is a solved problem. What most firms still do by hand is everything after: downloading the signed copy, renaming it, filing it to the right client-and-year folder, updating the job status, telling the lodgment person it's ready. All of that can happen automatically the moment the last signature lands. Our e-signing guide walks through what a good end-to-end workflow looks like.

3. Holding lodgment until the invoice is paid

If your firm has ever lodged a return and then spent three months chasing the fee, you already know why this one exists. A job flagged as payable simply cannot move to the lodgment queue until the client's invoice clears. A daily sweep checks payments and unlocks jobs on its own. We wrote up the full payment-gate workflow here.

4. Client intake that arrives half-done

Annual checklists and questionnaires don't need to start blank. Software can prefill everything the firm already knows — names, entities, bank details for refunds, last year's answers — so the client only completes what's genuinely new, on any device, uploads included. The reviewed pack then files itself to the client's folder.

5. Working papers that calculate

Depreciation balancing adjustments, Div 152 small business CGT concession tests, franking accounts, profit-to-tax reconciliations: these are deterministic calculations, and they should be done by deterministic code — not by AI guesswork and not by a spreadsheet someone last audited in 2019. The output lands in Word and Excel, in your templates.

6. The firm's memory

Clients, entities, directors, trustees, related parties, past correspondence — kept in one connected graph and refreshed nightly from your practice management system. This is the quiet one that makes the others better: an email draft is only as good as what the system knows about the client it's addressing.

Three things we deliberately did not automate

• The advice. Whether a distribution strategy makes sense, whether the client should restructure, how to handle a Div 7A problem — that's the job. Software can assemble the facts; it should not be making the call.
• The final send. Nothing in our practice reaches a client without an accountant approving it first. Every drafted email, every document, every action sits in an approval queue with a full audit trail. This is a design principle, not a limitation.
• The review. Automated working papers still get reviewed by a human who signs off. The automation removes the re-keying, not the responsibility.

Where should a firm start?

Not with a platform migration. Pick the one process that costs the most partner attention per week — for most firms it's either signature chasing or unpaid-invoice lodgment — and automate that first. If it earns its keep, expand. If it doesn't, you've lost one small project, not a year and a licence fee.

That's also how we work with other firms: one painful process, custom-built around your workflow and your sign-off rules, owned by you — not rented by the user per month.